11/18/2008 Home Print Contact 


 

Members Only

 

 

GEA and the Environment

(1) Aircraft Noise

Aircraft noise has historically been a major environmental issue for aviation. It remains high on the agenda of public concern, with the focus mainly on flight operations close to airports. Noise is a difficult issue to evaluate as it is particularly open to subjective reactions.

How is noise measured?

The most widely used unit for measuring noise levels is dB(A) (The A-weighted scale in decibels). This unit attempts to reflect human reaction to "loudness". The human ear's response to sound relates to sound pressure in a way that is approximately logarithmic. This means that a significant reduction in noise activity results in a comparatively small reduction in the noise perceived by the human ear.

However, there is another measure of noise uniquely related to aircraft: the perceived noise (PNdB) and effective perceived noise (EPNdB). These scales incorporate the different frequencies and duration of noise patterns, resulting from various speeds and modes of operation of aircraft. There is no agreement, even among the experts, on which measurement is the most representative, or the most relevant in a particular situation. However, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) uses EPNdB for expressing its noise certification standards.

A single aircraft operation can be measured by recording noise levels on the ground within the surrounding area. By joining points together which register the same noise level, a contour can be obtained which represents the "noise footprint" of that that particular aircraft movement. All of the movements of different types of aircraft can be integrated into a contour map of impact, thereby giving a picture of the overall noise impact at a particular airport.

Industry Efforts to Reduce Aircraft Noise

Over the last 10 years aircraft have been required to become less noisy. Consequently, the number of people living in areas exposed to unacceptably high aircraft noise has dropped significantly. In 1978, 6 to 7 million people lived within areas exposed to average cumulative noise levels of 65 decibels (dB) or higher. By 2000 that number has fallen to approximately 500,000.

This change was accomplished with the design of quieter engines and, as an interim measure, "hush kits" were installed on some older aircraft. The change came in three stages where the aircraft noise level in decibels was reduced to less objectionable and less dangerous levels. As of the first of January 2000 Stage 3, the final stage, was implemented. The noise level of Stage 3 aircraft is comparable to a busy urban street and is much quieter than the Stage 2 aircraft noise level which is similar to an amplified rock music concert.

The issue of aircraft noise is the responsibility of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and its Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP). Much of ICAO's effort to address aircraft noise over the past 30 years has been aimed at reducing noise at source (engine noise), although land use planning and management around airports, and noise abatement procedures for take-off, approach and landing are also addressed.

Since the first aircraft noise standards were adopted in 1977, engine noise reduction technology has been continuously developed and new generation aircraft have achieved a significant margin on this standard. The growing concern over increased aircraft traffic and the associated noise impact has impelled ICAO to concentrate its efforts on the development of a new noise standard and on removal of the marginal aircraft. In June 2001, on the basis of recommendations made by the CAEP, ICAO adopted a new, more stringent noise standard that imposes a cumulative increased stringency of -10 dB relative to current limits. Commencing 1 January 2006, the new standard will apply to newly certificated airplanes and to airplanes for which re-certification is requested.

GEA and its members welcome the new standard. They are engaged in retiring and replacing older jets and engines that do not meet noise standards. The express industry is committed to using the most environmentally friendly modes of transport available in order to be able to guarantee just-in-time next day delivery. However, public understanding is essential to an effective program to reduce aircraft noise so that we do not raise the expectations of airport neighbors for noise reductions beyond the levels that technology and reasonable cost-effectiveness can achieve.

Moreover, engine noise reduction will not be an effective solution on its own. While the express industry continues to make an enormous effort by renewing its fleet, authorities must also implement much-needed land-use planning and insulation programs around airports. This will strike the fair balance between protecting residents from noise and ensuring the well-being of the European economy.

Noise Reduction Efforts in Europe

Members of the European Express Association rely on over 223 aircraft on a daily basis to ensure that express deliveries reach their destinations overnight to meet customers' demands. Environmental considerations are key to selecting these aircraft and operators are currently investing over €3.3 billion in even quieter and cleaner aircraft for use in the EU.

The express industry does not rely entirely on air transport to deliver packages, indeed it has long been recognized for being a truly intermodal sector. As well as road and air, ferry services are regularly used for the short sea passages of shipments, particularly across the English Channel and between the islands of Denmark. Rail services, on the other hand, are not greatly used. Although the point-to-point speeds of rail can be high, especially for distances of between 100 and 500 kilometers, they are rarely so for freight. In Europe, the average freight train travels at around 15 kilometers per hour.

Nevertheless, express delivery continue to study the use of trains with other transporters of similar time-sensitive material, such as mail and newspapers, and will use rail services as and when the price and flexibility of the services match the needs of the express industry and its customers.

Why do we fly at night?

Express delivery companies work through the night to meet customers’ requirements for next day deliveries: realistic alternatives do not exist. These deliveries include emergency spare parts, key components for manufacturing, time sensitive pharmaceuticals, and business orders for new economy companies. Over 95% of traffic is business-to-business.

The operational patterns of express delivery make daytime operations at airports impractical. The hub and spoke concept of delivery pioneered by express companies requires a large number of aircraft to arrive at and depart from a single airport in a window of approximately four hours. Such concentrated air traffic cannot occur during the daylight traffic peak for passenger carriers.

(2) Aircraft Engine Emissions

Like most forms of transportation, aircraft produce chemical emissions as a result of the fuel combustion process within the engine. The principal effluents are water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

Technologies to increase fuel efficiency and to control the combustion process are the principal means to reduce aircraft emissions. In the past 30 years, the introduction of new technology has doubled aircraft fuel efficiency, significantly reducing aircraft emissions. More efficient flight operations also result in reduced delays and direct routing and also reduce the fuel required for a flight.

Further Reducing Aircraft Emissions

Aircraft are required to meet the engine certification standards adopted by the Council of the ICAO. These standards establish limits for emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, for a reference landing and take-off (LTO) cycle below 915 metres of altitude (3 000 ft). Although these standards are based on an aircraft's LTO cycle, they also help to limit emissions at altitude. There are also provisions regarding smoke and vented fuel.

The ICAO has adopted several approaches for meeting the standards. It promotes the use of operational measures as a means of limiting or reducing the impact of aircraft engine emissions. These operational measures address aircraft ground level and in-flight operations, as well as ground service equipment and auxiliary power units.

Additionally, the ICAO is developing a policy for the use of market-based measures to limit or reduce emissions.

 

©2008 – GEA


GEA Presentation on Balancing Trade Security and Facilitation
Remarks by Deutsche Post Chairman on its GoGreen Campaign
Updated report for Hungary available at flags link
CUTS-FICCI Statement on the Way Forward for WTO
Cape Verde Bcomes 153rd WTO Member
Updated Customs Capabilities Reports for Sweden, Costa Rica, Paraguay, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Finland are Available at the Flags Link
Trade Has Saved America from Recession
Updated Customs Capabilities Reports for Lebanon, Poland, and Qatar now available at the "Flags" link
Updated Customs Capabilities Reports for Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the Slovak Republic now at the "Flags" link
Customs Capablities Reports for Chile, New Zealand, St. Lucia, Switzerland, and Turkey Updated on the Flags Page
Customs Capabilities (Flag) Reports Upated
Former US Treasury Secretary Summers on New Case for Trade
Decline in Global Trade Growth in 2007 Softened by Growth in Emerging Markets
Chinese Shoppers Take to the Internet
World Bank releases Logistics Performance Index
Transparency International Releases 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index
US Fed Chairman Benjamin Bernanke on the Benefits of Trade
Latin Business Chronicle "Slow Customs Means Lost Capital"